Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear case about race-based college scholarships

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

Anya van Wagtendonk, NPR

Wisconsin is working out how to comply with a US Supreme Court ruling that significantly curtailed race-based college admissions

Seat for justics behind a long bench at the WI Supreme Court room
The Wisconsin Supreme Court room at the Capitol building. (RoyalbroilCC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons)

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has elected to hear a case about whether education grants for students of certain ethnic backgrounds are constitutional.

The decision from the high court comes after a state appeals court ruled earlier this year that the grants are discriminatory.

It also comes two years after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly curtailed race-based college admissions.

Caleb Gerbitz, an attorney at Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols in Milwaukee who writes extensively about appellate law, said Wisconsin justices could decide just how broadly the U.S. Supreme Court ruling applies.

“This was an interesting case because it’s a category that’s adjacent to college admissions,” said Gerbitz. “What the U.S. Supreme Court left open … is whether you can consider race in other settings, outside of academia.”

In February, an appeals court ruled that the state-run Minority Undergraduate Retention Grant Program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, by offering taxpayer dollars to low-income students of only some racial or national backgrounds.

Established by the state Legislature in the 1985-87 biennial budget, the grants program is earmarked for students who are Black, American Indian or Hispanic, or Southeast Asian from Laos, Cambodia or Vietnam admitted to the United States after Dec. 31, 1975.

The appeals court ruled the program must end because it uses tax dollars to “discriminate against individuals.”

Continue reading.

Discover the history of Black suffrage in Wisconsin, which gave Black residents a say in issues such as public schools and colleges.

More breaking news.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment