Becoming the Civil Rights Queen

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

From PBS

Constance Bake Motley sits at a desk in this monochrome photo
Constance Baker Motley, 1965. (National Archives and Records Administration)

How does one earn the moniker of “Civil Rights Queen”? For Constance Baker Motley, the journey began in New Haven, Connecticut in 1921, as the daughter of immigrants from Nevis (yes, the same Caribbean island that produced Alexander Hamilton). After graduating from NYU and Columbia Law School, Motley got her big break when Thurgood Marshall hired her as staff attorney for the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund. The future Supreme Court justice later remarked that his new protegée “just walked in and took over,” marking the start of an audacious six-decade-long legal career.

When Motley first entered the courtroom in the late 1940s, it was rare enough to see a female lawyer or a Black lawyer, let alone one who inhabited both identities. White judges and lawyers often refused to address her with the proper honorific, referring to her as “that Motley woman” or “her.” On one occasion, Constance Baker Motley corrected her opposing counsel: “If you can’t address me as Mrs. Motley, don’t address me at all.”

During her tenure with the NAACP, Motley authored the original complaint for Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark case that ended legal school segregation in the United States. But she didn’t just write briefs — Motley took to the front lines of the fight against segregation, leading the legal charge to desegregate public universities across the South — including the case that won James Meredith’s historic admission to the University of Mississippi. 

The first Black woman to argue before the Supreme Court, she won nine of her 10 cases, challenging segregation and defending the right to practice civil disobedience. She also provided critical legal support for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the Freedom Riders, and the young protesters of the Birmingham Children’s Crusade — all while fighting her own battles against discrimination and pay equity as a Black woman in the American workplace.

Continue reading about her efforts outside of the courtroom or watch a video about Motley.

Learn about other activists and social movements.

Follow more stories like this all month long in our breaking news.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment