King Charles photo with Caribbean officials under portrait of slavery-enriched monarch sparks criticism

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

By Catarina Demony, Reuters

King George IV of the United Kingdom in Coronation Robes (by Thomas Lawrence)
This painting of King George IV by Thomas Lawrence tjat appears in the background of a recent photo, has stirred controversy

LONDON, March 20 (Reuters) – Campaigners for slavery reparations and scholars have ​criticised the British monarchy after King Charles posed with Caribbean officials at a London reception ‌beneath a portrait of George IV, who profited from enslaved labour on plantations in Grenada.

Charles hosted on March 10 several Caribbean representatives at St. James’s Palace for the annual Commonwealth Day reception, attended by, among others, the foreign ministers of ​Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, and Trinidad and Tobago.

Grenada‘s high commissioner to Britain, Rachér Croney, ​was also in attendance, alongside other Caribbean diplomats.

A group of 29 guests at the ⁠reception posed for a photograph with Charles and British foreign minister Yvette Cooper beneath a large portrait ​of George IV. The image was subsequently shared across several accounts of some Caribbean foreign ministries as ​well as by a high commissioner.

GEORGE IV WAS ENRICHED BY GRENADIAN ESTATES: RESEARCHER

Research by independent scholar Desirée Baptiste shared with Reuters last year, found that 1,000 pounds ($1,331.20) – about 103,000 pounds today – were paid into George IV’s private coffers from two ​Crown-owned Grenadian estates worked by hundreds of enslaved people in the 18th and 19th centuries.

[…]

Experts said the finding increases pressure on the monarchy to confront its historical ties to slavery, ‌including ⁠issuing a full apology and acknowledging the ways it profited from it.

“It is offensive to have his portrait up,” Arley Gill, chairman of Grenada’s National Reparations Committee, said. “It is doubly offensive to have persons of African descent with the king below a photograph of him.”

“It just rubs salt in the wounds.”

Learn why the photo was a misstep to some.

More Black news.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment