Black Service Members Warn Military Is Moving Backward

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

Brandon Tensley, Capital B

Military service has long been seen as a means of upward mobility for Black Americans, but recent actions raise questions about inclusion.

Black serfice member
(RDNE Stock Project/Pexels)

A troubling notion has gripped some Black current and former service members: The U.S. military — long seen as a pathway to opportunity in Black communities — seems to be drifting backward, toward a more segregated time.

“[Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth] came into office promising to turn the military into a color-blind meritocracy — it is neither color-blind nor a meritocracy,” Theodore Johnson, a former U.S. Navy commander, told Capital B. “In fact, it is demonstrably less of both, as recent firings and denied promotions attest to.”

These actions, he and others maintain, continue a pattern of targeting Black contributions to the military, and raise fresh concerns about the future of diversity in the ranks. Black Americans make up some 17% of active-duty military personnel, compared with 14% of the U.S. population.

The highest levels of military leadership, Johnson added, “appear more like country-club nepotism” than selection of the best woman or man for the job regardless of race or ethnicity. He was referring to NBC News’ recent reporting that Hegseth has “taken steps” to block or stall the promotions of at least a dozen Black and female senior officers across the four branches of the military.

In response to this reporting, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-New York, who sits on the committee with legislative oversight of the Pentagon, has called for more information about the claims that have been made about Hegseth.

The New York Times also has reported that Hegseth blocked two Black and two female officers from being promoted to one-star generals.

In a statement, members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus called the decision “outrageous and wrong,” saying that the officers had “decades of exemplary service” and warning that the move reflects a broader effort to undermine women and people of color in the military.

Learn how some in Trump’s administration call this fake news.

College has similarly offered upward mobility but has faced funding cuts under Donald Trump.

More breaking Black news.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment