Special News Series: Rising Up For Justice! – Kenosha protesters sue Facebook and armed men they say helped incite violence

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

Introduction To This Series:

This post is one installment in an ongoing news series: a “living history” of the current national and international uprising for justice.

Today’s movement descends directly from the many earlier civil rights struggles against repeated injustices and race-based violence, including the killing of unarmed Black people. The posts in this series serve as a timeline of the uprising that began on May 26, 2020, the day after a Minneapolis police officer killed an unarmed Black man, George Floyd, by kneeling on his neck. The viral video of Floyd’s torturous suffocation brought unprecedented national awareness to the ongoing demand to truly make Black Lives Matter in this country.

The posts in this series focus on stories of the particular killings that have spurred the current uprising and on the protests taking place around the USA and across the globe. Sadly, thousands of people have lost their lives to systemic racial, gender, sexuality, judicial, and economic injustice. The few whose names are listed here represent the countless others lost before and since. Likewise, we can report but a few of the countless demonstrations for justice now taking place in our major cities, small towns, and suburbs.

To view the entire series of Rising Up for Justice! posts, insert “rising up” in the search bar above.

Kenosha protesters sue Facebook and armed men they say helped incite violence through social media

By Bruce Vielmetti, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

September 23, 2020

Kyle Rittenhouse and another heavily armed civilian
Kyle Rittenhouse and another heavily armed civilian walk along Sheridan Rd in Kenosha, WI. Prosecutors have charged Rittenhouse, 17, from Illinois, in the fatal shooting of two protestors and the wounding of a third during a night of unrest after the police shooting of Jacob Blake. Adam Rogan/Racine Journal Times

Four people who were protesting in Kenosha the night of Aug. 25, including the girlfriend of a man who was killed by Kyle Rittenhouse during the unrest, have sued Facebook and three armed men they say fomented violence through social media. 

The plaintiffs include Hannah Gittings, 23, who watched Anthony Huber, 26, die after he was shot by Rittenhouse, 17. Authorities say he was striking the teen with a skateboard and trying to disarm him shortly after Rittenhouse had shot and killed another man, Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.

Other plaintiffs include two Kenosha men and a Milwaukee woman who say they were subjected to threats, intimidation and violence by the defendants.

Besides Facebook, the defendants in the federal lawsuit include Rittenhouse, the Illinois resident facing homicide charges; Ryan Balch, a West Bend man who later wrote and spoke about being with Rittenhouse that night; and Kevin Mathewson, a former Kenosha alderman who formed the Kenosha Guard and used Facebook to call for armed followers to come to the city.

Mathewson and Balch have not responded to earlier requests for interviews. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Balch has been immersed in white supremacy.

The Kenosha Guard and the Boogaloo Bois, an informal group that advocates a race war in America, are also named as defendants.

The lawsuit notes that before the events of that night, Facebook had received 400 reports about the Kenosha Guard page violating the platform’s standards. The page was ultimately taken down, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said an “operational mistake” left some messages up too long.

The suit says that even though Facebook labeled Rittenhouse’s actions a “mass murder,” it said there were “no direct links between his accounts and the Kenosha Guard page.”

The lawsuit goes on to say: “However, common sense — and, likely, further discovery — counsels that Rittenhouse would not have known about or traveled to Kenosha but for the Call to Arms having been widely publicized.”

The lawsuit seeks a judgment that Facebook was negligent, and that the other defendants conspired to and violated the plaintiffs’ civil rights, and intentionally inflicted emotional distress. It seeks an injunction against any future militia-style actions during protests and unspecified damages.

Read the full article here.

More Breaking News here.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment