Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court ends apartheid, restores Freedmen citizenship

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

By Deon Osborne, The Blaxck Wall Street Times

After decades of denial, Creek Freedmen descendants win battle for citizenship in a case where anti-Blackness could’ve threatened tribal sovereignty.

Attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons speaks to reporters outside the Muscogee Creek Nation court building after a judge delayed ruling on a lawsuit that demands Black Creek descendants be reinstated into the tribe of their ancestors on December 1, 2022. (Mike Creef / The Black Wall Street Times)

The Muscogee (Creek) Nation Supreme Court ruled in favor of citizenship for Creek Freedmen descendants in a ruling Wednesday that rejected the Muscogee Nation attorney general’s attempt to deny citizenship rights to descendants of Freedmen formerly enslaved by the tribal nation.

“Are we, as a Nation, bound to treaty promises made so many years ago? Today we answer in the affirmative, because that is what Mvskoke law demands,” the Justices wrote in Citizenship Board of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Rhonda K Grayson, et al.

The Court ordered the citizenship applications for Freedmen plaintiffs Rhonda Grayson and Jeff Kennedy to go back in front of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Citizenship Board take back up their applications for citizenship in line with the Treaty of 1866, which applies to both Creeks on the By Blood Dawes Roll and the Freedmen Roll.

[…]

Ultimately, the Court struck down a system of deciding criticized as racial apartheid that was passed down from the U.S. government: a divided roll of human beings listed as the “By Blood” Dawes Roll and the Freedmen Roll.

[…]

For over 40 years, Freedmen descendants have waged legal battles and attempts to apply for citizenship after the tribal nation changed its constitution to deny restrict citizenship in 1979, a decision at odds with a treaty the Nation signed with the U.S. government promising to end slavery in its territory.

The original article has more details.

Check out the latest Black news.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment