‘Look good, run fast’: Black Olympians discuss the importance of their hair

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

By Char Adams, NBC

Brittany Brown (and Ashleigh Johnson
Brittany Brown (left) and Ashleigh Johnson gear up to rack up some medals for Team USA — all while also taking care of their tresses. (Leila Register / NBC News; Getty Images)

Black American women competing in the 2024 Olympics are in a massive spotlight — and so is their hair. 

Kendall Ellis, a 28-year-old sprinter, said she’s planning to highlight her kinky hair texture when she competes in Paris. After she qualified for the Olympics, she said, “it was one of the first things I thought about!” Ellis said she plans to wear a sew-in — hair extensions sewn over her braided hair — that is similar to her natural hair texture.

“I want to do a more natural-looking style, because I think it’s important to have that representation on such a large stage,” Ellis said.

As Ellis, a 400-meter runner, returns to the Games, she won’t be the only Black female athlete thinking about how she’ll wear and manage her hair. Competitors like water polo goalkeeper Ashleigh Johnson and track athletes Brittany Brown and Anna Cockrell represent a swath of Olympians approaching hair care in Paris not with dread and uncertainty, but as an opportunity to showcase their personal styles. 

“If you look good, you run fast!” said Brown, who will race the 200-meter sprint.

Black women in athletics have always faced scrutiny over their hair, from Venus Williams’ being penalized over her famous beaded hairstyle and controversy over swim caps for natural hair to the ridicule gymnasts like Gabby Douglas and Simone Biles faced for not having their hair “done.” 

Ketra Armstrong, the director of the Center for Race and Ethnicity in Sport at the University of Michigan, said this new generation of athletes is pushing back against hair discrimination. 

“For a while, Black women have had to make themselves presentable in a way that wasn’t perceived to be unkept or unprofessional,” Armstrong said. “Black women were judged by their hair, called not professional or not qualified. We’re at a point now where Black women are reclaiming their crown.”

Learn more.

This acceptance is crucial because hair products marketed toward Black women have health risks.

Our breaking news page spotlights more Black Olympians.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment