High Stakes Testing: The Rising Opt-Out Wave

Share

Explore Our Galleries

An NAACP flyer campaigning for the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 1922, but was filibustered to defeat in the Senate. Dyer, the NAACP, and freedom fighters around the country, like Flossie Baily, struggled for years to get the Dyer and other anti-lynching bills passed, to no avail. Today there is still no U.S. law specifically against lynching. In 2005, eighty of the 100 U.S. Senators voted for a resolution to apologize to victims' families and the country for their failure to outlaw lynching. Courtesy of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
Some Exhibits to Come – One Hundred Years of Jim Crow
Mammy Statue JC Museum Ferris
Bibliography – One Hundred Years Of Jim Crow
Claude, age 23, just months before his 1930 murder. Courtesy of Faith Deeter.
Freedom’s Heroes During Jim Crow: Flossie Bailey and the Deeters
Souvenir Portrait of the Lynching of Abram Smith and Thomas Shipp, August 7, 1930, by studio photographer Lawrence Beitler. Courtesy of the Indiana Hisorical Society.
An Iconic Lynching in the North
Lynching Quilt
Claxton Dekle – Prosperous Farmer, Husband & Father of Two
Ancient manuscripts about mathematics and astronomy from Timbuktu, Mali
Some Exhibits to Come – African Peoples Before Captivity
Shackles for Adults & Children from the Henrietta Marie
Some Exhibits to Come – The Middle Passage
Slaveship Stowage Plan
What I Saw Aboard a Slave Ship in 1829
Arno Michaels
Life After Hate: A Former White Power Leader Redeems Himself

Breaking News!

Today's news and culture by Black and other reporters in the Black and mainstream media.

Ways to Support ABHM?

Aziah Siid, Word in Black

Between the stress they cause and racial bias, growing numbers of parents say they’ve had enough of their kids bubbling in Scantron forms.

A young Black student prepares for a standardized test (The Atlantic)

As the school year draws to a close and the echoes of the final bell are still fresh, there’s a collective sigh of relief amongst students who have just navigated yet another round of high-stakes standardized testing. 

[…]

For many students, the stakes are indeed high. According to the Education Commission of the States, at least 10 states have enacted legislation where student promotion hinges primarily on standardized test scores. An additional six states have adopted a hybrid model, where promotion decisions are determined by a blend of test scores and other influencing factors.

But many parents have had enough. They’ve joined the national opt-out movement and are exempting their children from the drill and killing the stress of standardized testing. They’re also asking questions about the direction of our educational system: Is the integral role of comprehensive student evaluation being undermined by an overemphasis on test scores? And in our pursuit of standardized measurements of student progress, are we risking a more holistic, nuanced understanding of a student’s abilities and potential? 

Harry Feder, executive director of Fair Test, works to combat the overuse and misuse of standardized tests. He says although implementing tests was intended to serve students, it disproportionally impacted Black students instead. 

Standardized Testing and Black Students

“The idea was that if we test kids every year, every grade level, in various disciplines, that it would benefit Black kids,” Feder says. “Why? Because it would tell us — what we knew already — but it would provide the evidence, that Black kids are being underserved because they are not performing as well.” 

[…]

“There are several problems with this model,” Feder says. “The first is it makes the schools, particularly in communities of color — particularly for Black kids — all about test prep, and what doesn’t get done is the kind of rich learning and deeper learning we want our kids to engage in.” 

Part of understanding the relationship between standardized testing and Black students is to also understand the roots in which they were created, both good and bad.

“The data is very clear that there are inherent biases in standardized tests. The concept of them are kind of born in racism and eugenics, but it is definitely a way of ranking and sorting that does not do justice to poor kids and kids of color,” Feder says. 

Learn more about why parents are opting their children out of standardized testing in the original article.

Explore this virtual exhibit to learn more about historical injustices Black students faced in America.

Read more Breaking News here.

Comments Are Welcome

Note: We moderate submissions in order to create a space for meaningful dialogue, a space where museum visitors – adults and youth –– can exchange informed, thoughtful, and relevant comments that add value to our exhibits.

Racial slurs, personal attacks, obscenity, profanity, and SHOUTING do not meet the above standard. Such comments are posted in the exhibit Hateful Speech. Commercial promotions, impersonations, and incoherent comments likewise fail to meet our goals, so will not be posted. Submissions longer than 120 words will be shortened.

See our full Comments Policy here.

Leave a Comment